| The conclusion is from the coincidence of two or more events from one event to create a causal relationship that logically represents a fallacy called cum hoc ergo propter hoc, and the term language is used as an indication of the existence of a causal relationship that leads to the occurrence of coincidence | Real opposite of final coincidences, if there is a real coincidence, then one physical process that will be the cause of each of the detector signals, in the event of two different random processes, the two signals of this detector will be temporarily correlated |
|---|---|
| Compare identities with known specifications Document the location of the meeting as well as determine the time at which it was encountered | serendipity is a combination of events which are not individually beneficial, but occurring together produce a good or wonderful outcome |
| The coincidence process is carried out automatically with the help of the aforementioned tools, for example if there is no communication in a place or time, or even if the identities are deviating from the specifications, all this will lead to a lack of coincidence and the request is not fulfilled or the service is executed | Coincidence is the criterion that leads to the fulfillment of a request or service, and here we find that coincidence is determined in a number of steps close to each other, and these steps are reflected in: Identification of the objects or persons involved |
|---|---|
| Like most worthwhile adventures, the origins of this particular grand excursion are rooted in pure serendipity |